On 7/10/07, Serge E. Hallyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A (still under construction) list of features we expect to be worked on > next year looks like this: > 4. task containers functionality > specific containers
A couple of more container subsystem requests that have come out of the Linux Foundation Japan symposium, although I think they've also been mentioned before more than once - per-container swap and disk I/O scheduling. I'm not familiar enough with the current Linux disk scheduler code to know how easy/hard it is to add rate guarantees on a per-container basis, but the swap one should be easier. One potential issue with the swap container is how integrated should it be with the memory controller? I can certainly see people wanting to be able to use a swap controller without requiring a page-based memory controller (e.g. you might want to combine it with node-based control via cpusets instead) but adding two pointers to the mm_struct, one for swap controller subsystem and one for memory controller subsystem, seems a little bit ugly. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
