On 2005-12-21, Nikodemus Siivola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robb Aley Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I thought it might be useful to propose an overall structure for a >> new Lisp faq, and begin to fill it in. Such a structure might allow > > I'm replying at a random point -- not to this message specifically. > > I'm somewhat concerned that many of the questions aren't FA -- and > many of the sections in the proposed structure don't IMO belong in > an FAQ at all
I agree that our FAQ should have FA Q's in it. To that end I spent some time over the weekend searching for "lisp question" in cll; I found a Q I'd seen a couple times before, and submitted an A for it. I think the answers in our FAQ should grow that way, though I also think we should have a pre-defined structure. (I haven't looked at Robb's proposed structure in detail yet.) I think it boils down to, if you don't think a Q is FA, don't A it. If you find what you consider a FA Q, A it, and we'll add it. -- Larry _______________________________________________ cl-faq mailing list cl-faq@lispniks.com http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/cl-faq
