On 20.02.2006, at 23:04, Roger Sen Montero wrote:

It's always the same trade off: try to create a closer to lisp API vs. not
getting to far away from the original one so the new API is easy to
understand.

The goal is having an OpenGL binding in Lisp, which doesn't require
people to think about C-ish things like having to pass pointers to arrays
in order to get the current color.


The guys at pyopengl did a mirror of OpenGL. I don't know what
should you do in lisp-gl, but for my graphical library I decided to
diverge from the SDL lib.

We don't really diverge and try to keep the mapping between the C
and Lisp names obvious. The macro in question is pure sugar and
doesn't have a C equivalent.

(defun draw-foo ()
  (gl:with-primitives :quads
    (gl:color 1 0 0)
    (gl:vertex -1 -1 )
    ...
    (gl:vertex 1 1)))

instead of

(defun draw-foo ()
  (gl:begin :quads)
  (gl:color 1 0 0)
  (gl:vertex -1 -1)
  ...
  (gl:vertex 1 1)
  (gl:end))

--
  Oliver Markovic


_______________________________________________
cl-opengl-devel mailing list
cl-opengl-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-opengl-devel

Reply via email to