On 11/12/06, Oliver Markovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12.11.2006, at 09:44, Bart Botta wrote: > Second is changing the GLenums from cffi:defcenums to defconstants. > Advantages I can think of from doing that: This is not. The whole point of cl-opengl was having hand-written bindings that feel Lispy and not like a direct mapping to C. I do NOT want to write code like (gl:clear-color (logior gl:+color-buffer-bit+ gl:+depth- buffer-bit+)) or having to think about how to construct a foreign array to pass to glLightfv.
I'm not arguing that the behavior of the hand written API should change*, just the shape of the parameters. gl:clear still handles combining the arguments, it just uses logior instead of make-bitfield. *(well, actually, I might argue that the API should change, but if I did, the argument would be that cl-opengl is too low level, not that it should be closer to the C API :)
If somebody wants to use bindings like this, Glouton[1] or kt-opengl [2] seem like a better fit.
Or my bindings if I release them, I was just hoping to have that behavior as a subset of cl-opengl to avoid pointless forks :)
Off the top of my head, I can name GL_LIGHTi, GL_AUXi, GL_TEXTUREi, GL_CLIPPLANEi and GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENTi_EXT and I don't know a single graphics card whose limits exceed those defined in the spec/ headers, since a few of these are obsolete anyway thanks to programmable hardware.
I was thinking more of workstation level cards, 3dlabs realizm, etc. http://www.delphi3d.net/hardware/viewreport.php?report=1503 Easy enough to just add more enums to cover the extra if you stay with cffi enums, so it isn't too much of a problem.
> *compatibility with other bindings (glx and cl-sdl both use +foo+ > style for enums if I remember correctly) I neither care about GLX nor CL-SDL. If neither CLX, nor any other non-C library use +foo+, why should we? Personally, I think it looks way too ugly.
Sorry, I meant CLX, not GLX : http://common-lisp.net/~crhodes/clx/gl.lisp and CL-SDL is a set of lisp bindings for SDL and OpenGL. The 2 libraries you linked both used GL_FOO style constants/defparameters though, so not sure how much it matters.
But even then, the performance impact of doing so at runtime is neglible.
Might be, I'll have to see if I can think of any concrete tests and try it... _______________________________________________ cl-opengl-devel mailing list cl-opengl-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-opengl-devel
