Since Luís hinted in a previous message to the list that consensus need be sought on whether or not to merge cl-opengl-thomas in to the main tree, I thought I would get the ball rolling for when he is free to do so (or not as the case may warrant).
I offer these points as pro-merge: - With CFFI-new-types merged into CFFI-main, the main cl-opengl repo probably won't compile for anyone starting out using 'darcs get' or (require :cl-opengl) and will break for anyone using 'darcs pull' - Most recent patches have been requested to patch against the thomas branch - As far as I know, there's been no regression in the GL functionality area merge cons: - In it's current state, thomas will break some cl-glut-examples demos Anyone concluding differently or similarly? Comments? Charlie McMackin _______________________________________________ cl-opengl-devel mailing list cl-opengl-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-opengl-devel
