On 20/01/2008, David Lichteblau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately cl-opengl and CLX both define a package called GL, so we > cannot dump a core file including them. > > Is there a chance that cl-opengl might switch to a more specific package > name?
That sucks. We need namespaces for packages. I'd argue that CLX could more easily use GLX as the package name. Any luck on that side? -- Luís Oliveira http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/ _______________________________________________ cl-opengl-devel mailing list cl-opengl-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-opengl-devel
