Yep. A (face2face or irc) meeting at this point would be nice. Tell me when and how.
Regarding your proposal, it is good if you figured out how to implement the operations using current CLAM::Network api. Anyway, remember a nice side result of your project would be enhancing such api, so you have kind of license to modify and extend it. It could also be a later refactoring but if at some point the API messes in the middle, just propose a better one. David. On Tuesday 01 March 2011 19:30:55 Xavier Serra wrote: > Nice! I'll take a look at it. I'm still crawling through CLAM interface > searching for methods that we'll use in the proxy. Do you want to > meet when I have somewhat of a proposal? > > Bye, > Xavi > > PS: In the meantime I'm also doing refactorings to the python interface, > to keep it moving > > On Mar 1, 2011, at 12:11 AM, David García Garzón wrote: > > Xavi, I commited a minimal version to start working with > > Clam_NetworkProxy. Now, the default proxy for ipyclam is the clam one > > and it would work with dummy proxy when you add the --dummy option. > > > > The clam proxy just implements availableTypes() and has an empty > > implementation for processingNames i needed to check that availableTypes > > worked. As you see seems quite easy. > > > > I wouldn't add a test for availableTypes, it would be a quite fragile > > test as it would depend on the plugins we have. But i would add tests > > for the rest of modules in Clam_NetworkProxyTest.py mimicing Dummy's. > > > > David. > > _______________________________________________ > clam-devel mailing list > clam-devel@lists.clam-project.org > http://lists.clam-project.org/listinfo.cgi/clam-devel-clam-project.org _______________________________________________ clam-devel mailing list clam-devel@lists.clam-project.org http://lists.clam-project.org/listinfo.cgi/clam-devel-clam-project.org
