On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 19:15, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > I have a feeling that (recursive) archieve processing should be a
> > separate library, I mean, separate from scanning for viruses. The API
> > could be like this:
> >
> > process_archieve(char *arch, size_t asize, int recurse_depth,
> > int(*scan_buffer)(char *buf, size_t size, void *priv),
> > void *priv);
> >
> > scan_buffer would be called on every indivilual archieve member mmaped()
> > into RAM (or better just unpacked into RAM).
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> There might be an additive command for that, but using it instead of the
> current model will break the "transparent" archive support.
Maybe transparent processing could be a wrapper around archieve
processor and direct scanner?
blind_scan:
magic analysis detects archieve?
yes: process_archieve(data,...,virus_scan,...)
no: virus_scan(data,...)
Just a thought...
Eugene
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Clamav-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-devel
