On Monday 21 Feb 2005 09:25, -=MikeP=- wrote:
> Hello Nigel,
> 
> Monday, February 21, 2005, 11:55:13 AM, you wrote:
> 
> NH> On Monday 21 Feb 2005 06:54, -=MikeP=- wrote:
> >> It would be great if there would be fixes of that kind in ClamAV:
> >>
> >> 1) add support for QNX NTO in configure.in:
> 
> NH> What is NTO? 
> >> nto*)
> >>      if test "$have_pthreads" = "yes"; then
> >>         AC_DEFINE(CL_THREAD_SAFE,1,[thread safe])
> >>         disable_gethostbyname_r="no"
> >>      fi
> >>     AC_DEFINE(C_NTO,1,[os is QNX Neutrino])
> 
> NH> Does this mean NTO == QNX? In this case why not #define C_QNX?
> 
> NH> -Nigel
> NH> _______________________________________________
> NH> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
> 
> There are 2 versions of QNX:
> QNX4 - this system supports building programs in GNU way, but has too
> many problems with libtool and auto***. In other words - it is not
> suitable for porting...
> 
> QNX6 (Neutrino) - usually referred to as QNX NTO so in many other apps
> and in fixed libtool it is known as NTO.
> I would not mind against C_QNX, but QNX4 users can misunderstand that
> and think QNX is supported.

I understand, in that case howabout #define C_QNX6?

-Nigel

-- 
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK.  ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.uk
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html

Reply via email to