On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 06:58:09AM -0400, Dale Walsh said: > > On Aug 13, 2005, at 03:16 PM, Stephen Gran wrote: > > >Hello all, > > > >I see that gcc-4.x is much pickier about all sorts of things than the > >3.x series was, and emits warnings for any kind of mismatch. Most of > >them are admittedly harmless, but I do like seeing as clean a > >compile as > >possible. Would you be interested in a patch to clean up signedness > >issues? It is likely to be rather large, and tedious work, so I > >wanted > >to ask before spending the time on it. > > > >Take care, > > DId you ever work on this as you had suggested/offered???
I have (almost) finished a fairly disruptive transatlantic move, during which most of my computers were basically unusable for development work. Now that they are back on, and I am somewhat settled in, I am going to take a look at it. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Stephen Gran | <xtifr> direct brain implants :) | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | <knghtbrd> xtifr - yah, then using | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | computers would actually require some | | | of these idiots to think! <knghtbrd> ;> | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
