On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 08:55:45AM +0200, Tom G. Christensen said: > Stephen Gran wrote: > <snip> > >(e.g., I'm not sure > >whether or not clamav compiles with gcc 2.x - I do remember that for a > >while the milter at least failed with that compiler)? > > > I build every release on RHEL 2.1 and my notes says this was fixed in > 0.87.1.
Good to know, thanks. For a while, I was also building every release against woody, which shipped with 2.95, but I have finally dropped it. At any rate, I think an 8 year old standard is probably recent enough to ask for some level of compliance. But as always, it's up to the dev team to decide how they'd like to do this (if at all). Thanks, -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Stephen Gran | A verbal contract isn't worth the paper | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | it's written on. -- Samuel Goldwyn | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
