Another thing,
If I force troot->ac_only=0
if(troot) {troot->ac_only=0;printf("\ntroot->ac_only IN TROOT!!!%d
\n",troot->ac_only);
if(troot->ac_only || (ret = cli_bm_scanbuff(upt, length,
ctx->virname, troot, offset, ftype, desc)) != CL_VIRUS)
ret = cli_ac_scanbuff(upt, length, ctx->virname, NULL, NULL,
troot, &tdata, offset, ftype, desc, ftoffset, acmode, NULL);
printf("\nRET IN TROOT!!!%d \n", ret);
if(ret == CL_VIRUS) {
<<cut>>
It doesnt change anything, I get the same results for troot->ac_only=1:
---------output------------
troot->ac_only IN TROOT!!!0
<<<<<<<<<<<cli_ac_scanbuff>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<root->ac_root6488480>>>>>>>>>>>>
RET IN TROOT!!!0
groot->ac_only IN GROOT!!!0
<<<<<<<<<<<cli_bm_scanbuff>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<root6346288>>>>>>>>>>>>
RET IN GROOT!!!1
Inside cli_scanraw function After inst. RET: 1 <|>
../test/vir/tinyVirus: TinyVirus.UNOFFICIAL FOUND
cl_scandesc function has been called. RET:1
-----------Extended SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Known viruses: 1
Engine version: 0.94.1
Scanned directories: 0
Scanned files: 1
Infected files: 1
Aco-Corasick: ENABLEBoyer-Moore: DISABLEData scanned: 0.00 MB
Time: 0.004 sec (0 m 0 s)
----------end-output--------------
If I force groot->ac_only to 1 I got 'segmet fault' (seg fault is
another funciotn - cli_scanraw)
---------------code---------------
if(!ftonly) {(groot->ac_only=1; printf("\ngroot->ac_only IN GROOT!!!%d
\n",groot->ac_only);
if(groot->ac_only || (ret = cli_bm_scanbuff(upt, length,
ctx->virname, groot, offset, ftype, desc)) != CL_VIRUS)
ret = cli_ac_scanbuff(upt, length, ctx->virname, NULL, NULL,
groot,
&gdata, offset, ftype, desc, ftoffset, acmode, NULL);
printf("\nRET IN GROOT!!!%d \n", ret);
if(ret == CL_VIRUS) {
---------------end-code-----------
Does anybody tried to change this flags? Swap scanning algorithms?
Thanks in advance,
Tom
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net
