G.W. Haywood wrote: > What you say is true. However it would be much clearer that you > understand that your new milter breaks a lot of existing and even in > some cases carefully crafted and well tested code on many mailservers > if you had apologised for it once more instead of simply snipping the > part of the OP's mail which mentions it.
It does not break anything. In fact I've written a new milter without touching the old one. If it suits you, go on and use it. If it doesn't just use the old milter. Up to you. And... apologies for? > You can expect administrators who find themselves having to script > their way around your changes to wonder if there might be a package > which both provides equivalent functionality and has a stable API. Again I dont. If you don't want to change, just don't. Also, if you fell like maintaining the old milter please send us patches. It's still sitting under /contrib and will always be available there. I'll be committing them for you. As a side note the new milter was announced on December the 5th. In exactly 4 months i've received 1 bug report, promply fixed, and, as of yesterday, 0 feature requests. See http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20081205.152347.a7d7c9ee.en.html Cheers, -aCaB _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net
