Dale, Not that it *should* matter, but what is your architecture?
On 03/24/2014 05:33 PM, Shawn Webb wrote: > On what up-to-date OSs can I find gcc 4.0 in active use? I'll briefly try > to recreate the problem in my spare time for you. > > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Dale Walsh <d...@daleenterprise.com> wrote: > >> When it builds completely under GCC 4.0, I would be more than happy to >> offer detailed debugging information and dumps that would be beneficial to >> the project but as it stands, a bug report at bugzilla.clamav.net isn't >> anything I would consider wasting my time on but you are more than welcome >> to file the report yourself. >> >> It makes no sense for me to file a report as I may use the source files >> but nothing else, I repackage it so I can build it and rather than listen >> to stupidity about my method of building being the root of the problem, >> informing you like other have should be sufficient to warrant an in-depth >> investigation into the matter. >> >> -- Dale >> >> >> >> >> On Mar 24, 2014, at 17:32 PM, Steven Morgan wrote: >> >> Yes, a dmg issue and an xar issue were mentioned. If the issue(s) remain, >>> please open a bug at bugzilla.clamav.net or send some files or --debug >>> output. >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Joel Esler (jesler) <jes...@cisco.com >>>> wrote: >>> Then I am sure the developers would be glad to help figure out the >>>> problem >>>> and fix it. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Joel Esler >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On Mar 22, 2014, at 13:32, "Dale Walsh" <d...@daleenterprise.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> 0.98.1 DMG does not work. >>>>> >>>>> -- Dale >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mar 21, 2014, at 09:16 AM, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: >>>>>> DMG support was just added in the last version of ClamAV. How long ago >>>>>> >>>>> did you do this testing? >>>>>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 8:22 PM, Dale Walsh <d...@daleenterprise.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> You did miss it but it's a two headed nail. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PDF, DMG, XAR and RAR have had issues not recognizing the test viruses >>>>>>> >>>>>> to name just a couple that spring to mind that we've had trouble with >>>> and >>>> this all started happening when the clang and crap entered the picture. >>>> >>>>>>> I've worked with the developers in the past, once the build >>>>>>> >>>>>> environment dependancies changed and I was told I had to upgrade my OS >>>> and >>>> build tools is when it was no longer possible to resolve these issues as >>>> the update solely for the purpose of building ClamAV is not an option >>>> and I >>>> shouldn't be forced to use someone else's built tool preferences just >>>> because they have the luxury of updating on a whim or purely for bragging >>>> rights. >>>> >>>>>>> It does not matter if my OS is dated, security patches are applied to >>>>>>> >>>>>> the build tools as they become available and this seems to satisfy all >>>> other software that build from source except ClamAV. >>>> >>>>>>> Having everything build with GCC 4.0 would allow me/us to re-deploy >>>>>>> >>>>>> ClamAV and contribute to the code base again (I have in the past) but >>>> the >>>> chances of this are slim to non from what I recall because my OS and >>>> build >>>> tools are dated and listening to rants about ancient and deprecated is >>>> nothing more than someone spewing stupidity. >>>> >>>>>>> The fact that I ensure all bugs and updates to the build tools are >>>>>>> >>>>>> fixed/added allows me to keep everything in harmony and there is no >>>> reason >>>> to update anything to build a single software package when all other >>>> software sources seem to be content with the existing build environment. >>>> >>>>>>> If you wish to go off-list to continue the discussion I have no >>>>>>> >>>>>> objections. >>>>>>> -- Dale >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 16:35 PM, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: >>>>>>>> Dale, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks for your email. I'm not sure exactly what you are referring >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> to. Maybe I am missing a connection here or something, but the >>>> discussion >>>> was around scanning DMG and XAR, which I think, if there's a issue with, >>>> we'd be more than happy to work with anyone to try and square away. >>>> >>>>>>>> You seem to be discussing a build issue, and you say that it's a >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> waste of time. When did you get the impression that working with the >>>> developers was a waste of time? If we're not communicating well enough, >>>> we >>>> can fix that. But I think the team is doing a good job of that judging >>>> by >>>> the amount of complaints I have received since we took over the project >>>> from the old ClamAV team. >>>> >>>>>>>> Please let me know if we need to take this offline and discuss or >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> anything I can do to help. >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Joel Esler >>>>>>>> Open Source Manager >>>>>>>> Threat Intelligence Team Lead >>>>>>>> Vulnerability Research Team >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Dale Walsh <d...@daleenterprise.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:d...@daleenterprise.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Mark, this has been an issue for many versions along with a slew of >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> others things not working as expected. >>>>>>>> As much as I liked ClamAV, we've abandoned it as a mail solution >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> shortly after things stopped working correctly and they changed the >>>> required build tools so you can no longer build it with GCC >>>> 3.3/4.0/4.1/4.2 >>>> and have a fully functional app. >>>> >>>>>>>> Yes there are flags to get it to build but certain modules and >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> features don't build and making an incomplete and partially functional >>>> binary isn't appealing. >>>> >>>>>>>> Advice on updating build tools is a waste of time as there is no >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> reason to update the build tools just to build ClamAV as it's the >>>> only one >>>> that has this ridiculous built-tool requirement and only an idiot would >>>> tell me to update. >>>> >>>>>>>> My thoughts on this is simple, if it doesn't build with the basic GNU >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> GCC compiler tools then it's seriously flawed and needs these other >>>> tools >>>> to overcome the short-comings of poorly written/implemented code. >>>> >>>>>>>> When I say build, I mean build with full functionality so don't go >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> off the deep-end stating it builds, partial functionality may be >>>> acceptable >>>> to you bhut it isn't to me. >>>> >>>>>>>> At this time, for personal use, I use the source code but repackage >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> the build environment to work with what I have and I'm comfortable >>>> with >>>> submitting corrections and patches, too much focus and complaints on my >>>> build tools so why waste my time. >>>> >>>>>>>> -- Dale >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Rafael Ferreira wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Interesting... let me run some tests and get back to you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Mark Allan <markjal...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> <mailto: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> markjal...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Just out of interest, did you test to see if it *actually* worked? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My configure output shows that dmg and xar are supported, but it >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> doesn't actually detect the Eicar test file within a disk image. >>>>>>>> configure: Summary of engine detection features >>>>>>>> autoit_ea06 : yes >>>>>>>> bzip2 : ok >>>>>>>> zlib : /usr >>>>>>>> unrar : yes >>>>>>>> dmg and xar : yes, from /usr >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When I create a new disk image, copy the Eicar test file in, and scan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> the dmg, it shows up as being clean. >>>>>>>> clamscan test.dmg >>>>>>>> test.dmg: OK >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ----------- SCAN SUMMARY ----------- >>>>>>>> Known viruses: 3259558 >>>>>>>> Engine version: 0.98.1 >>>>>>>> Scanned directories: 0 >>>>>>>> Scanned files: 1 >>>>>>>> Infected files: 0 >>>>>>>> Data scanned: 10.07 MB >>>>>>>> Data read: 10.02 MB (ratio 1.01:1) >>>>>>>> Time: 4.845 sec (0 m 4 s) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does this work as expected for anyone else? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mark >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 10 Feb 2014, at 23:38, Rafael Ferreira <r...@uvasoftware.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:r...@uvasoftware.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>> That worked, thanks! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On February 10, 2014 at 4:29:41 PM, Steven Morgan ( >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> smor...@sourcefire.com<mailto:smor...@sourcefire.com>) wrote: >>>>>>>> Rafael, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Probably all you need to do install libxml&libxml2-dev, which is used >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> by >>>>> dmg and xar, then do your configure/make. >>>>>>>> Steve >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Rafael Ferreira < >>>>>>>> r...@uvasoftware.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:r...@uvasoftware.com>>wrote: >>>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm compiling clamav 0.98.1 on Linux (Ubuntu 12.04 LTS) and I'm not >>>>>>>> getting the new super awesome DMG and XAR file support: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> configure: Summary of detected features follows >>>>>>>> OS : linux-gnu >>>>>>>> pthreads : yes (-lpthread) >>>>>>>> configure: Summary of miscellaneous features >>>>>>>> check : no (auto) >>>>>>>> fanotify : yes >>>>>>>> fdpassing : 1 >>>>>>>> IPv6 : yes >>>>>>>> configure: Summary of optional tools >>>>>>>> clamdtop : (auto) >>>>>>>> milter : yes (disabled) >>>>>>>> configure: Summary of engine performance features) >>>>>>>> release mode: yes >>>>>>>> jit : yes (auto) >>>>>>>> mempool : yes >>>>>>>> configure: Summary of engine detection features >>>>>>>> autoit_ea06 : yes >>>>>>>> bzip2 : ok >>>>>>>> zlib : /usr >>>>>>>> unrar : yes >>>>>>>> dmg and xar : no >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am I missing a configure flag or third party library? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks in advance, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Rafael >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ---- >>>>>>>> scanii.com<http://scanii.com> - the web friendly malware scanner! >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >> > _______________________________________________ > http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html > Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net
