> You are right. It depends on how you link to clamav. But for this case, It is 
> obvious that "BitMedic" links libclamav  internally and ship it on Mac app 
> store. Those guys make money with clamav, it is unfair for clamav development 
> team and community members. I am wondering who is in charge of this issue in 
> clamav team.

It has always been the intention of ClamAV to offer a free and open source 
solution, and that is what is happening, even with

My suggestion would be to review the licensing of client libraries, maybe it 
would make more sense to license these parts under
the LGPL.

- mb

Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla:

Reply via email to