Hi, I use qmail-scanner + clamscan + spamc/spamd. spamc seems to be very leightweight. Besides it is very handy to run spamd using daemontools, so it would be nice to run clamdscan/clamd in the same way as spamc/spamd. As the clamdscan man page says, it can be used as a replacement for clamscan. Is there any gotchas for running qmail-scanner + clamdscan/clamd + spamc/spamd instead? As far as I see, renaming clamscan, and then symlinking clamdscan to clamscan would be enough to make it transparent to qmail-scanner. Am I missing something?
Johan Kuuse --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
