On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:37:56 +0000 (GMT) Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > Oh, you're right - there was no chance to disable the timeout
> > (however clamav.conf states that 0 disables the limit). It's even
> > better to use:
> >
> > if(timeout && ths[i].active)
> >
> > instead of
> >
> > if(timeout && (time(NULL) - ths[i].start > timeout))
> >
> > I will fix it ASAP, thanks.
> >
>
> Your patch is incorrect. It will always be true for threads that are
> currently in use and they will instantly be killed.
I disagree. The patch does the same thing that yours.
Best regards,
Tomasz Kojm
--
oo ..... [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ClamAV.net
(\/)\......... http://www.clamav.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg
\..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B
//\ /\ Thu Jan 15 17:27:59 CET 2004
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
