Le Ven 19 mar 15:41:34 2004, Wolfgang Cernohorsky �crit: > > At this time, I'd like the recipient to be warned of a quarantined mail. > > I tried many things but I never succeeded to except if I also warn the > > sender. (what I don't want) > > I think, today 99,9% of mails with viruses or worms contain no usefull > information for our recipients, so to warn them is nearly senseless.
You're right, but some users reject the idea that theyre email may be deleted without warning. If you want to send warning, it's better to notify the recipient than the 99,9% of time innocent sender. Once the users see how many virus or virus notifications they recieve, they quickly ask theyre admin to drop them all. So, the best thing to do is to offer three choises : keep the detected virus, send a notification or drop quietly. The notification is be the best default. The users don't recieve the virus and they are seeing that the admin take care of theyre mailboxes :-) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
