* Michael V. Sokolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040402 11:51]: wrote:
> On Friday 02 April 2004 12:05, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>
> > Why check messages larger than 1MB for viruses? I seriuosly doubt they
> > could contain malware, though it's possible. I don't scan messages >1MB.
>
> m-m-m, seems, that sounds quite wisely, because anyway we have second stage TM
> Mailscan and personal NAV installed at end users.
>
> So, how much limit is optimal to set up ?
Let's hear other people's opinions.
cheers
- wash
+----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------+
Odhiambo Washington . WANANCHI ONLINE LTD (Nairobi, KE) |
<wash at wananchi dot com> . 1ere Etage, Loita Hse, Loita St., |
GSM: (+254) 722 743 223 . # 10286, 00100 NAIROBI |
GSM: (+254) 733 744 121 . (+254) 020 313 985 - 9 |
+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+
"Oh My God! They killed init! You Bastards!"
--from a /. post
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
