Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Actually, it is usually happen the Clamav recognises the virii before > the other AV vendors so no well-known name was available. See the > archive for the more detailed answers, this question already answered > here.
So maybe, as with celestial objects, there should be agreement that the first AV 'vendor' to publish a detection for a virus should be given the honour of naming it and the other vendors adopt the same name rather than inventing their own (and potentially causing confusion). So if Clamav is first, other vendors should adopt its name and if some other vendor is first then Clamav should use the name that vendor gives it. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
