Antony Stone wanted us to know: >> accepting every single message, MailScanner would be fine. If, like me, >> you prefer to 5xx reject messages that you don't like (virus, spam, >But, what is the advantage of this? It does not reduce your bandwidth by
No it does not reduce the bandwidth, however it does reduce the size of your queue. You should not ever let an email touch the surface of your disk if you do not want to accept it. >the content to decide not to accept it. I can't think of any benefit in >rejecting the message rather than receiving it and discarding it? In the event of false positives, *THEIR* logs say that it was rejected as opposed to trying to figure out why something was accepted but the end user is never receiving it. -- Regards... Todd They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. --Benjamin Franklin Linux kernel 2.6.3-8mdkenterprise 3 users, load average: 0.03, 0.01, 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
