On Thursday 20 May 2004 7:21 pm, Peter Bonivart wrote:
> Jim Maul wrote:
> > There is something that is causing clamav to not be able to detect this
> > virus after the message has been bounced and now forwarded.
>
> Damaged bounces are not dangerous. Why bother making signatures for them
> when you don't make money showing how many viruses you detect?
What do you mean by "damaged"?
It sounds to me as though Jim's email still has a perfectly viable virus
attached to it; it is simply attached in a way that ClamAV isn't recognising.
As he said, " If i scan this text file, clamscan 0.70 does not find any virus.
If I remove the lines below: [snipped here] from the top of the message, then
clamscan finds Worm.SomeFool.P."
Regards,
Antony.
--
There are two possible outcomes:
If the result confirms the hypothesis, then you've made a measurement.
If the result is contrary to the hypothesis, then you've made a discovery.
- Enrico Fermi
Please reply to the list;
please don't CC me.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
