>
> 2. I am using my 0.71 versions of clamav.conf and freschclam.conf. What am
> I going to lose by doing this?
>
> In the mean time, I'll go read the 0.75.1 conf files and see what I can
> pick out.
>

No differences in freshclam.conf, but clamav.conf had one change. Added it
and up and running.

Still, however %f does NOT tell me the file as 0.6n did. I now get
something, however. It passes 0.00000 to me. I don't know why, it just
does. Do any of you know why? I'd really like to know what file is
infected. It's pretty useless as it is. I kicked off a clamdscan on / and
it chewed up system resources so badly I had to kill it...

Also, along that line, is there an option that will tell me where in an
email source file of, say 1.5MB, the virus is found? I've even resorted to
doing a cat fffff|wc then using head -nnnn|tail -nnnn but can't get
clandscan to work in that mode.

Karl



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users

Reply via email to