On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 12:27, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 09:58:41AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > > > Because current clamd implementation is not to "die" on > > > > memory allocation error, but sleep. > > > > > > It doesn't die, it's being killed by the kernel. > > > > No - clamd does a malloc and that fails. Then instead of dying (which would > > be the proper thing to do IMHO), it sleeps a few microsecs and then tries to > > malloc the memory again. Infinite loop occurs... > > Ok, THAT's bad - and should be fixed.
If it were true it would be. Please point me at some code in clamd that does that. -trog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
