On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 15:24, Rob Evers wrote: > Trog wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 14:30, Stefan Hornburg wrote: > > > > > >>In that case we should probably rot somewhere, but you make the life for packager's > >>of ClamAV (e.g. Debian) unnecessarily hard. > > > > > > Are you saying that you would otherwise have simply left the existing > > clamav.conf file unaltered, thereby leaving users open to known > > malware/viruses? > > > > -trog > > > > Maybe parsing the old configure file and warn during install or > runtime if there are obsolete or missing options ?
And what prevents that happening now, prefixed by a 'mv'? The only difference is that now the packagers have to actually think about it, rather than just ignoring the issue of new config directives. -trog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
