Jeff Ball wrote:
The Cobalt RaQ2 has the following...
gcc-c++-2.7.2-c3r2
gcc-objc-2.7.2-c3r2
gcc-2.7.2-c3r2
glibc-2.0.7-29.4C2
and  0.80rc3 will not build.  again.

I'm wondering if I should work on making a new patch, wait longer, or just give up because I will never have a newer compiler, etc... and clamav will require them?


[....]
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I./zziplib -I./mspack -g -O2 -c scanners.c -Wp,-MD,.deps/scanners.TPlo -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/scanners.lo
In file included from others.h:24,
from scanners.c:55:
cltypes.h:35: warning: redefinition of `int8_t'
/usr/include/sys/types.h:103: warning: `int8_t' previously declared here
cltypes.h:40: warning: redefinition of `int16_t'
/usr/include/sys/types.h:105: warning: `int16_t' previously declared here
cltypes.h:47: warning: redefinition of `int32_t'
/usr/include/sys/types.h:107: warning: `int32_t' previously declared here

Not a great problem (only warnings, and I guess they were properly defined. Something the configure script could be patched for.


[....]
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I./zziplib -I./mspack -g -O2 -c chmunpack.c -Wp,-MD,.deps/chmunpack.TPlo -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/chmunpack.lo
In file included from others.h:24,
from chmunpack.c:44:
cltypes.h:35: warning: redefinition of `int8_t'
/usr/include/sys/types.h:103: warning: `int8_t' previously declared here
cltypes.h:40: warning: redefinition of `int16_t'
/usr/include/sys/types.h:105: warning: `int16_t' previously declared here
cltypes.h:47: warning: redefinition of `int32_t'
/usr/include/sys/types.h:107: warning: `int32_t' previously declared here
chmunpack.c:72: parse error before `uint64_t'

Also something for the configure script. Could you please add the line

typedef unsigned long long unit64_t;

before the last #endif to libclamav/cltypes.h and report if that helps?


Zeffie... 734-454-9117 http://www.zeffie.com/ Home of the Worlds Largest Collection of RaQ rpms


Thomas _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users

Reply via email to