John Jolet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On the issue of manually reviewing the mails to submit....isn't this the > purpose of the quarantine directory? When it detects a phishing > malware, look at the file in the quarantine directory.
I also don't believe in quarantine directories, which have to be checked by admins or users anyway after all. If I accepted messages and then filtered them into a quarantine directory, false positives would get lost without the sender being notified. Instead I outright reject unwanted messages during the SMTP transaction, so the sender gets notified. My users can see what messages have been rejected by skimming over a list of recently rejected messages once or twice a week (see an example here[1]). This practice has proven to work well for me and my users. :-) References: 1. http://julian.io.link-m.de/misc/rejected-messages _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
