[EMAIL PROTECTED](aCaB) 15.12.04 16:12
>http://www.clamav.net/3rdparty.html Thanks. In the really meanwhile long long linear list of mail scanners I only see the (non GPLed) "DansGuardian Anti-Virus Patch". Do you mean that? AFAIK is DansGuardian payware except for private use. And there is still the question: Does it make sense to use clamav in the http stream? Are there signatures for http-specific-exploits? Protecting against dowloading bad files does not need http stream filtering, it can be done on the disk too. BTW: Someone on this list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) uses the symantek virus scanner which rejected my mail to the list! Is symantec already censoring clamav? ;-) I don't see any "bad" contents in my mail. I that a know problem? Suject: Symantec Mail Security detected prohibited content in a message sent from your address (SYM:34903824072041735314) Subject of the message: [Clamav-users] clamav as HTTP scanner? Recipient of the message: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Rainer _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
