On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 09:39:14PM +0100, Steffen Heil said: > Hi > > > Which bug in particular? Do you want to open a bug in the BTS about it, > so you are notified when a new version is uploaded that closes it? I may be > misremebering, but I don't remember the segfault in question. > > This one: > > > Tue Dec 7 23:10:36 GMT 2004 (njh) > ---------------------------------- > * libclamav/mbox.c: Handle empty content-type in multipart headers, > e.g. Content-Type: ; name="/tmp/foo/bar.txt"
Gotcha. I missed that one. > One of my clients gets such mails about every day. And thats an really > important mail of some officials here.... :( > However, it simply takes down exim/exiscan/clamd. The two things that can be done in exiscan to avoid this are: This unpacks before giving to clam, so a bug in the unpacker isn't triggered: demime = * (or use the mime acl for this) And this passes mail through if there's a problem with clam: malware = */defer_ok HTH, and here's hoping for 0.81 :) -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Stephen Gran | Hope is a good breakfast, but it is a | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bad supper. -- Francis Bacon | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
pgpOB9FyRu6Zb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
