On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:46:48 -0500 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Kyle Victor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Second is there a best practice that says running the clamscan > command as I am is not as good as running clamd and checking mail > with clamdscan? It depends on the loading of your server, clamscan spawns a new process for each scan whereas clamdscan makes use of a daemon that can have more than one instance of itself running waiting for additional clamdscan processes to attach. If you have a heavy email load, clamd is the thing to run. -- Brian Morrison bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
