> On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 09:25 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: > > >=20 > > We do a lot of on-line commerce. We cannot tolerate many false positives. > > Phishing exploits are something we deal with through education first, and > > filtering second. As phishers become more sophisticated and numerous fals= > e > > positives will rise leaving education as the final solution. I prefer > > using my filter processes for defending against them as I can fine tune > > them to our needs. > >=20 > > And how many Phishing false positives have you had exactly? > > -trog
Quite a few in my own filtering. I add x-headers rather than block them so it is possible to keep track. If clamav is blocking them then I have no idea as we don't quarantine. How many are needed for it to be a bad idea? Can it even happen with Clamav? I don't know and I can't risk it. dp _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
