On Monday 14 Feb 2005 02:40, Damian Menscher wrote:
> Is there a performance benefit to using --external? 

Depends on your set up. I load balance the scanning across several servers
so I use --external.

> I'm wondering if  
> this is similar to the clamscan/clamdscan performance difference.  Does 
> clamav-milter cache the virus database when running in the internal 
> mode, or does it have to load it for each message?

Cache isn't the right word to use, but the database file is not loaded for every
message.

> How does clamav-milter know about freshclam updates?  I assume it has to 
> check for updates regularly?  Is this selfcheck interval configurable 
> somewhere?

1) It uses the clamAV API to tell it that a new one has been loaded
2) Yes
3) It looks *at least*  as often as set by readTimeout in clamd.conf. Of course 
this
is not good, sharing one variable for two separate uses, it will change at some 
time.
The *at least* part is because it also looks when it has nothing else to do.

> Damian Menscher

-Nigel

-- 
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK.  ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.uk
_______________________________________________
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users

Reply via email to