Thanks a lot,

but i want to compile from sources... binaries are no good and rpms are good 
for red-hat users :)
                                                                        
I'm starting from another point of view.. i want to do a script that can 
understand how i first installed 
clamav (meaning what ./configure options i used) and downloads the last clamav 
version untars it and 
compile and install the last version on the old one (replacing the old conf 
files with the new 
ones).� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �

Cheers,
Lorenzo� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �
� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �
� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �
� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �
� �Lorenzo Allori
Systems Administrator
Office: +393491924516
Mobile: +393398612411
The Medici Archive Project
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-----Original Message-----
From: Dale Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ClamAV users ML <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:05:40 -0500
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Tool to upgrade

> 
> On Mar 02, 2005, at 11:04, Allori Lorenzo wrote:
> 
> > Dear Group,
> >
> > I think i will make a script to automate the process myself..
> > I really think the clamav developers have already done a great work 
> > providing us clamav sources,
> > so why bothering them for creating a new system for upgrading the 
> > clamav itself i think we can still
> > compile from sources: i will see how to manage and I'll post in the 
> > list how solved this problem, if
> > someone needs it.....
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Lorenzo
> 
> Lorenzo, I already had previously started working on a software update 
> routine for a different project that I believe could be a solution to 
> this.
> 
> It requires a couple of things, a host with an xml file that holds the 
> latest version number to test against, a repository of binary builds to 
> obtain the updates from and finally someone who can generate all of the 
> platform binaries and place them on the server within a reasonable time 
> frame.
> 
> Here is what I can provide.
> 
> A server with space specifically donated for this task, the ability to 
> mirror this site to reduce load, the xml file that auto updates itself 
> based on the ClamAV websites main page that uses a robot (or other 
> acceptable method) to extracts the version number for the latest stable 
> release.
> 
> All I would need would be an A record from the DNS providers of ClamAV 
> pointing to the IP in question (something like "update.clamav.net A 
> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx "), additional mirror sites and the binaries for other 
> platforms that are non Macintosh and the code required to install these 
> binaries based on their respective platforms (this could be as simple 
> as un-tarring and moving to the destination location or as complicated 
> as building and installing the source).
> 
> This would require a commitment from specific people to 
> generate/provide the binaries in a timely manner and a lot of behind 
> the scenes work would have to take place to make it all happen.
> 
> Specifics like the frequency of version checks, a realm established for 
> communication between the update server and ClamAV to prevent any 
> unnecessary or unwanted access at the ClamAV websites update 
> communication protocols and, other issues would have to be addressed.
> 
> This would require participation and input from the ClamAV team to make 
> it all work together and is something very doable but, I'm not the one 
> to give authorization on this side project and I believe a proper 
> proposal would have to be generated and submitted to Tomasz for 
> authorization unless you strictly wanted to undergo the entire update 
> project on your own.
> 
> While I trust the ClamAV team is dedicated to providing the very best 
> in their product, because of this dedication, I am more than willing to 
> bend over backwards to do anything I can to assist in any way I can as 
> my way to show my appreciation for the invaluable product they generate 
> and everything else is icing on the cake.
> 
> A public discussion on this subjects intricate details would not be 
> appropriate, I see no reason in not discussing the public aspects 
> openly but I think that the first order of business would be to 
> assign/elect/appoint someone to spearhead this side project and then 
> design an acceptable proposal for submission to the ClamAV team.
> 
> In a public discussion, it would be reduced to an interest in the 
> project or not, programming details while public input will be 
> required, it's not a general topic for everyone to participate in so a 
> kinda feature survey would be the most likely route to follow as a 
> starting point.
> 
> These are just my thoughts and opinions and do not represent the 
> thoughts and opinions of the ClamAV team and are currently not 
> endorsed, expressed or approved by the ClamAV team to the best of my 
> knowledge.
> 
> -- Dale
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Reply via email to