[EMAIL PROTECTED](Tomasz Kojm) 13.03.05 20:05 >On 12 Mar 2005 14:33:00 +0100 >Rainer Zocholl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But i wonder how clamscan could scan 100GB on a 40GB partition: >> >> # df /home/ftp >> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on >> /dev/ataraid/d0p10 39412652 35180136 4232516 90% /home/ftp >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_compression Wow, if you haven't said that ;-) I meant that clamav states something in its summary i can't verify. (See above my concers to truncate the bytes scaned to "mio" bytes) But I can easiliy count how many "real files" are there and too determine how big they all are. And if clamscan did find another count, something is wrong. (Using "LVM snapshots" there no change during the entire scan) The problem i know several virusscanners had have: They gave up recursion somewhere to early, maybe because of a "..." file or directories with unicode or control or '\0' characters, or simply because the recursion was too deep and the paths buffers too short or the wrong way to "cd" was used or a bug in the operating system function they used.. Rainer _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
