Julian Mehnle said: > Tomasz Kojm wrote: >> Julian Mehnle wrote: >> | I absolutely concur. Considering that exactly _no one_ here demanded >> | that ClamAV abandon its capacity for detecting phishing attacks, >> | little yellow rubber ducks in PNG images, or whatever else, the uproar >> | is truly ludicrous. What was actually requested is that there be an >> | _option_ not to scan for certain classes of malware. No one would be >> | disadvantaged by that. >> >> Such an option will be available in 0.90. > > Well, that is certainly a nice prospect! Thanks a lot for not ignoring my > request.
That was pretty hard to do. dp _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
