Bill Taroli wrote: > Eric Wheeler wrote: > > [...] For email transfer and MTA's alike, putting SPF in DNS to help > > "authenticate" the source is a step in the right direction. If SPF is > > a good idea, and it is dns based, then so should forward-and-back > > lookups. > > I totally agree that some solution is desirable to these issues. There > are several efforts underway, including SPF -- which now appears > (according to a recent visit to http://spf.pobox.com/) to be a formal > part (or companion) to Sender ID.
Uhm, no. There is SPF (AKA SPF Classic), and there is Sender-ID. S-ID is based on SPF, but SPF is independent from S-ID. The SPF project is currently working to set up a new website. Significant parts of http://spf.pobox.com are outdated. But this is mostly off-topic here. For more information, join the spf-discuss mailing list: http://spf.pobox.com/mailinglist.html mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpDZm1OsjFAZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
