Dennis Peterson wrote:
Eric Scopinho said:

But if I do that, some side effects could happen like:

- I'll need free space to store the file.


You're not properly committed and funded to support this activity.
Maybe.


- The infected packets may get in while I store the next packets to scan.


There is no way on earth you can possibly identify an infected packet with
ClamAV. As such, point one is irrelevant.

Maybe, but things can change. All that I know is that I have one appliance in front of mine right now performing a virus scanner inline, and it work´s fine, independent of the protocol. I'm just thinking about how they did that!

- I have to download the whole file before send it to the end-user.


Read some RFC's.
IMHO, this post is unnecessary. No ofense, but I always beleive if you don't have some answer or suggestion people should just listen. In this case, for instance, something like: "Try RFC 793/1323" whould be better, since I didn't see any message saying this maillist is just for "high-ultra-top-guy" specialists.

dp


_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


E.S


_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Reply via email to