On Thursday 29 Sep 2005 12:08, Don Levey wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 9/28/05, Don Levey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> And clamd -V reports what?
> >>
> >> That gives me 0.87, just like the others.
> >> I didn't kill (or restart) any of the clam processes when I
> >> upgraded, but previous upgrades stopped/started the processes as
> >> part of the installation (I install from RPM).  I only see freshclam
> >> as a running process; I run clamav-milter and sendmail, which
> >> otherwise has worked well for me.
> >
> > It is a bug in logwatch. If you do not logrotate daily then the
> > logwatch scriptlet for clamav will flag that no matter how long in the
> > past. I havent had time to try and find a fix.
>
> Ah, I see - so it's not really a problem with the versions per se.  When
> the logs rotate again, will it clear up?

have a look in /var/log/freshclam.log and see what it says there. If it is 
reporting 0.87 then all is well

The current version of logwatch (6.1.2) picks up freshclam fine, if you want 
to rotate freshclam.log try adding someting like this to /etc/logrotate.d

# cat freshclam
/var/log/freshclam.log {
        daily
        missingok
        rotate 30
        compress
        delaycompress
        notifempty
        create 600 clamav root
        sharedscripts
        postrotate
                /etc/init.d/freshclamd restart
        endscript
}

also have a look in /var/log/messages, which is most likely where clamav is 
logging.

you could also set LogVerbose in clamd.conf and freshclam.conf and restart 
them both. Have a look at the logs afterwards, that should help you find out 
which version you are *really* running, or wether you have got a mixup in 
your install, which seems quite common when RPMs are used to install, if that 
is how you did it ;-|

Remember to switch off LogVerbose afterwards!

HTH
-- 
-----------------
Bob Hutchinson
Midwales dot com
-----------------
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Reply via email to