Tomasz Kojm wrote: >>Can somebody confirm that the upx.c buffer overflow vulnerability >>referred to at http://secunia.com/advisories/18379 (2006-01-10) is the >>one that was fixed in CVS on Sept 16.
> No, that's not that one. Ok, thanks for the prompt answer. Can you tell me if the Secunia vulnerability mentioned above has been attended to (hopefully to remove the vulnerability), and approximately when, and whether it's now fixed in CVS and/or 0.88? Thanks for your time. Steve _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
