-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
Steve Basford wrote:
> Firstly, I just wanted to say a big thanks to everyone who's sent
> samples, encouragement and comments,
> regarding the unofficial phishing signatures!
>
> Secondly, just updated the Unofficial ClamAV Phishing Signatures,
> which now contain 690 sigs :)
>
> I've updated the site here with links to live stats, for those
> interested (scroll down page):
> http://www.sanesecurity.com/clamav/
>
> For interest, I finally found time to do a phishing database compare
> too, using the latest sigs.
>
> Official Sigs Only:
> Known viruses: 46438
> Engine version: devel-20060309
> Scanned directories: 25
> Scanned files: 882
> Infected files: 535
> Data scanned: 7.80 MB
> Time: 301.994 sec (5 m 1 s)
> (Total Missed: 347)
>
> Official/Unofficial Sigs Combined
> Known viruses: 47120
> Engine version: devel-20060309
> Scanned directories: 25
> Scanned files: 882
> Infected files: 858
> Data scanned: 5.15 MB
> Time: 222.800 sec (3 m 42 s)
> Total Missed: 24 (which I'm looking into) ;)
>
> Just a reminder, If anyone has phishing samples, send em to: steveb
> []AT[] webtribe []DOT[] net
>
> Cheers,
>
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
>
Nice Initiative! I will start collecting phishing-attempts again :-)

Was is the official stance of the ClamAV team on this? Any chance of
unofficial sigs getting included in the official sigs after review?

Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus - Orange XL
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
 
iD8DBQFEGHvsVf373DysOTURAuVbAJwMJAFgpf1Y1nyy1xU4pvBnMub+bACgx8X7
rqzV01iFDNBSzDbAzDdqgwY=
=wmj5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Reply via email to