--- Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sandeep Agarwal wrote:
> >
> > checked the logs after sending a mail size 6MB.
> > reading the logs its clear that this is not clamd
> > problem. its something else, whats the
> "w_c:elapsed
> > time" in the log below ? i guess its the time
> waiting
> > in the queue. if yes how can this be fixed ?
> >
> You don't include the entire log for that particular
> mail message being
> processed (and I'm sure the readers of this list
> appreciate that as this
> isn't a ClamAV problem). One of those timestamps
> will be much larger
> than the others, so that's the one that is the cause
> of the problem.
this is the only details in the log file for this
process. it seems that the server is taking long in
receiving mails.
# cat qmail-queue.log | grep ":31100:"
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:35:41 IST:31100: +++ starting
debugging for process 31100 by uid=90
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:02:25 IST:31100: w_c: elapsed time
from start 1604.306495 secs
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:02:26 IST:31100:
return-path='[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
recips='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:02:26 IST:31100: from='Sandeep
Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>', subj='Fwd: axe
effect!!', via SMTP from 206.190.48.98
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:03:11 IST:31100: clamdscan:
finished scan in 44.9711 secs
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:03:11 IST:31100: SA: message too
big - skip it
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:03:11 IST:31100: p_s: finished
scan in 0.011766 secs
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:03:11 IST:31100: ini_sc: finished
scan of
"/var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/ngblhost1114414874176031100"...
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:03:11 IST:31100: ------ Process
31100 finished. Total of 1650.008028 secs
> Are you sure you don't have an actual network
> problem?
can you guide me how can i check that its not a
network problem.
If none of the
> Qmail-Scanner subprocesses is responsible for the
> large times, then
> there is only one other option - network. Having
> mismatched duplex
> settings on the server's Ethernet card can do this,
> as well as
> long-distance-over-unreliable-links SMTP clients.
> i.e. maybe 1299 of
> those 1300 seconds is actually how long it took the
> message to be
> written to the queue - which indicates a slow
> network - not a software
> problem. The new release of Qmail-Scanner
> specifically separates out
> that time now - for this very reason.
Thanks for the help
Sandeep
__________________________________________________________
Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner now. Go to http://yahoo.shaadi.com
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
