Daniel T. Staal wrote: > On Wed, April 5, 2006 1:34 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > >> Where exactly the line is drawn is of little importance, but it's >> better to have a known limit with known consequences (REJECT) than >> an unknown limit with unknown consequences (server crash). > ... > Having ClamAV's resource use being the limiting factor in these > situations doesn't help ClamAV.
Agreed, especially since ClamAV is a general virus-scanning tool and not specifically for email. I could see the line being drawn at >700MB for a shop that deals heavily in .iso's, which would entail lotsa space on the MTAs and high-powered MUAs. But there should still be a line (probably measured in GB, for such a shop) -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902 Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
