> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Jens Strohschnitter wrote:
>
> > yes indeed, but we have changed our mailscanner from sophos to clamAV, so
> > some mailboxes have already the virus in the queue :-(
> >
> > Ehm, by the way, we are using amavis 0.3.13 as mailscanner, but the
> > performance
> > is very bad - is clamd working better for a mail-emergence up to 5000
> > mails/day ?
> >
>On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:34:42 +0200 (CAT)
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Here we are using clamav-0.88.4 with MailScanner-4.56.1 on a Celeron 2.8
> with 512 MB of RAM. We don't use clamd - just clamscan. That works like a
> charm with from 15 to 25 thousand messages a day. There is never a
> backlog of more than a couple of minutes. We are just using a standard
> clone with ordinary IDE drive. On the other hand with our earlier server,
> using an AMD-K6 500 MHz with only 256 MB of RAM we did struggle at times
> when there was a large batch of incoming mail. Have a look at your swap
> usage - ideally it should be used very little or not at all. If it is
> being used then consider adding more RAM.
>
Hi
sounds good - I will try out the mailscanner.
--
Regards,
Jens Strohschnitter
-------------------------------------
*!!!LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX!!!*
* http://www.jens-strohschnitter.de *
-------------------------------------
Set the controls for
the heart of the sun
-------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
