On 11/14/06, Christopher X. Candreva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, zamri wrote:
> I assume the answer is yes. :)
No, it probably means you didn't provide any of the information that was
asked for -- what it found, your platform and OS, etc.
Your premise that rc.2 isn't "updated" is wrong. There may be a language
barrier causing this, but it does not appear that you understood what we
were saying. I gave an example of a particular bug on a particular platform.
If you aren't running Solaris on Sparc ,than this isn't the problem.
I use Linux Mandrake 10.1 with clamav 0.90rc2 (compiled from source).
All other utilities are standard prepackaged.
One example : (scanning after running freshclam)
----
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# /opt/bin/clamdscan /opt/tmp/Ermasys32.exe
/opt/tmp/Ermasys32.exe: OK
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Infected files: 0
Time: 0.076 sec (0 m 0 s)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# /opt/bin/clamdscan --version
ClamAV 0.90rc2/2183/Fri Nov 10 16:37:51 2006
That file was detected as worm for clamav 0.88.5. I think this is
sufficient to prove that 0.90rc2 was not able to detect it and I
presume 0.90rc2 virus db wasn't updated simultaneously as 0.88.5/6.
What would u think this happenned? Is it the difference in scanning
engine or low in priority than stable one (0.88.6)?
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
