Wyle Coyote wrote:
> I don't want to get off track and this certainly has.
> I think it is important people don't spin their
> wheels, with mis-information.
I don't think it is off track at all. It concerns the building of
Clamav on FreeBSD. The only mis-information here is that you
are saying it does not work when it does.
>
> 91 doesn't build with the current port tree on a 4.X
> box. It was stripped of 4.X. It can not build.
>
You are wrong. If you don't believe me, try it. Like I said,
I have successfully built and installed 0.91.1 on 4.11 from
the latest ports tagged with "tag=." I have working proof of
this.
> Here is snapshot from the port Makefile for 91.1
> Freebsd ver 1.1.02
>
> .if ${OSVERSION} < 601103
> CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --disable-gethostbyname_r
> .else
> CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-gethostbyname_r
> .endif
>
> # This port has a problem with -pthread,
> # force to use -lthr until it's not fixed.
> .if ${OSVERSION} >= 601000
> PTHREAD_LIBS= -lthr
> .endif
> # Maybe the port is broken for
> # FreeBSD 5.2.1 since -lc_r
> # and -pthread have both issues there.
> .if ${OSVERSION} == 502010
> PTHREAD_LIBS= -pthread
> .endif
> ----snip----
>
> No 4.X support. Also note 4.X requires -lc_r for
> pthread.
>
Those if statements are for special conditions for FreeBSD versions
greater then 6.1 and equal to 5.2.1. I don't see anything in there
that precludes it from building on 4.11.
Steven
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
