Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: > Gregory Carter wrote: >> I totally agree, but I think after you pointed out 4(a), all the other >> issues cited simply makes further discussion pedantic. > > Well, I'd like to add a remark. The discussion about all these issues > isn't pedantic, as long as... > > ...all of us have in mind that the goal of pointing out and discussing > all these points is to improve the quality of the tool, not to prove > that the tool is bad. > > So thanks to all guys involved in ClamAV developpement. > > JM
I would even go so far to say that the ClamAV team has done more on their worst day to combat security attacks than has the person issuing the warning on the best days of his lifetime. One thing is certain - most people ClamAV are getting more value than they are paying for. dp _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
