Christopher X. Candreva wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, shuttlebox wrote: > >> Maybe you could also try the packages from Blastwave? >> >> http://www.blastwave.org/packages.php/clamav > > Wow, this is a switch -- don't we usually tell people they are better of > compiling from source ? :-) > > Seriously, do you have a reason to think this particular version would work > where our self-compiled versions don't ?
And don't you just love having yet another binary tree to manage? /opt/csw? What the hell is that? It compiled fine here but for legacy support reasons I'm using gcc 3.2.2. dp _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
