Eric Rostetter wrote:
> Well, we disagree on that point. It is a security tool, and as such
> has an even greater burden to try to be as secure as possible.
In order for a security tool to be "as secure as possible", it first of
all needs to adhere to this basic principle:
The tool behaves as advertised.
Unless the behaviour with weird recipient addresses was prominently advertised,
then it's surprising behaviour, and surprising behaviour is the enemy of
security.
Regards,
David.
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
