Aecio F. Neto wrote: > On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Bernd Petrovitsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> users could take the appropriate action ASAP instead of finding out or >>>> having to check the logs on an hourly basis for problems. >>> You're (by you I mean everyone agreeing here with how ClamAV fails) >>> assuming users install packages. That's old fashioned. >>> Most people distribute updates with Puppet and such tools >>> automatically. With a largely complex system (which a good mail system >> >> And it was *their* decision to do so. >> And it was *their* decision to actually use the free as in beer ClamAV >> in the first place. Perhaps these people should move to a commercial >> virus-scanner where such problems probably do not happen. >> > > That's one kind of argument I cannot stand for. > Because one decide to use a "free as in free beer" software one must suffer > due this decision.
This seems a bit dramatic. Nobody is suffering. It takes but 10 minutes 3 or 4 times each year to visit and modify the ClamAV config files, if at all. Somebody's inner drama queen is getting the best of them here. dp _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
