On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 01:33 -0700, martinnitram wrote: [...] > Just wonder, if use EPEL repository src rpm, why don't use the binary rpm > from repo directly?
Never tried that recently. If I have to guess: missing dependencies, need for newer packages, some packages may have been renamed and proper "obsoletes" are missing, ... Yes, all that is a packaging/distribution issue (and not an application/ClamAV issue). BTW I tried to rebuild http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/SRPMS/clamav-0.95.1-1.el5.src.rpm on FC4 and it wants a "fedora-usermgmt-devel" package (which doesn't exists there). Commenting out the 2 lines in the .spec file makes the package build. No, I didn't try to run it. Waiting for 0.95.2 to have a reason for an update. > BTW, some of servers of our clients also running FC3, which using the > source tar from clamav.net, seem work so far so good. We run it (also) on RHEL3 (and didn't notice any problems). No, I don't remember on which RedHat/Fedora that was based. RHEL/CentOS3 needs a few more simple tweaks - bintulis are far older there. [ Fullquote deleted ] Bernd -- Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/ mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55 Embedded Linux Development and Services _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
